Setting the record straight!
How sad that Bradford on Avon Council felt it necessary to use a whole page in their Spring Newsletter to have the final word on Becky Addy Wood (BAW) so that they could move into the election season blaming everything on a few poor local residents who have apparently caused so much stress to Councillors and so much damage to the wood.
The Council triumphantly announce the formation of the BAW Liaison Committee to ‘foster an open and constructive relationship’ with those who paid most of the money to buy the wood, as if this was their big idea.
They fail to mention that throughout the court case they refused to sit down and talk face to face with the residents group, the Friends of Becky Addy Wood (FROBAW), and that the reason why this Committee was not set up months earlier, in accordance with the original agreement signed in 2020 by the Town Clerk on behalf of the Council, was that nothing they proposed was ever intended to be permanent. It wasn’t until they were ordered to do so by the Judge in May 2024 that they finally came to the table to set up the Liaison Group and that was only after being pressed by FROBAW to comply.
In the negotiations with FROBAW the Council were consistently evasive and “tricky”, trying to change the wording of the draft Liaison Committee Agreement without notifying FROBAW. They persist in blaming the action on two local residents who were in fact representatives of the community and the 140 or so people who originally raised over £30,000 to buy the wood. (The council put in £7,000.) It is not true that the action could have been withdrawn at any time as the reality is that the Council insisted that the action could only be withdrawn if FROBAW relinquished any say in the wood’s protection or if the residents paid the Council’s costs, neither of which would have been acceptable solutions, as it was always the Council who were in breach of the agreement they signed before the purchase.
There are no true winners here. The residents had to raise £175,000 as a contribution to the Council’s costs but surely the real story is that the Council actually spent £486,000 on their own legal costs fighting this case and nothing in their article remotely goes towards justifying how they could have allowed their spending on their “Post Office” solicitors to get so out of hand.
Every meeting on this subject has been held “in camera” and so the true extent of the impact on Council reserves, over £300,000, has been hidden from the voters in Bradford on Avon. No one on the Council has accepted any responsibility for this rampant overspending and the only way in which anyone can be held accountable is for people in Bradford on Avon to use their votes to show their disapproval.












